Talking Points:
2 – (middle): There was one quote that I felt really stood
out and summed up the middle of this article. Delpitt states, “To provide
schooling for everyone’s children that reflects liberal, middle-class values
and aspirations is to ensure the maintenance of the status quo, to ensure that
power, the culture of power, remains in the hands of those who already have it”
(p 28). This is such a powerful statement. It brings up the conversation of
power that Delpitt has in the earlier portion of the article. Power is such a huge
component of inequality and a huge part of the racism that we see in our
society today. I know our students see it but I often wonder why Providence
never addressed power dynamics and the effect of power dynamics in the
classroom. I received a lot of information and training on that through TFA but
never through PPSD. How does that affect our students?
3 – (end): I found that Delpitt’s argument towards the end
of the article on her beliefs of what needs to be done in order to work towards
equity in and outside the classroom. He top down approach is one that I think
many educators don’t think about as we often think about the change we can make
in the classroom and how that change will have a ripple effect in the future (first
three paragraphs on page 40 explain her solution). This made me think about Trump and the racially motivated issues that began to occur around the time of the 2016 election. Could this have been directly related to the ways in which Trump's power motivated others to act in ways motivated by racism? If Delpitt's solution were followed and the top-down approach was taken could the opposite effect have occurred in the 2016 election?
Argument Statement: Delpitt argues that the current education
system is not meeting the needs of POC for the majority of their education
(including K-12 and higher education); students do not feel seen or heard in
the classroom.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete